Quote from ShefkiLike I said the test isn't perfect I didn't have time to duplicate your default config in raid frames in PB4. It's not easy making a fair comparison. So I kept it simple. Are you seriously complaining about a comparison that you won? Generally I tune over an entire AV run just like you said, my testing of various improvements are done that way. But it's far easier to make a tweak and run some AV's and see how it does that it is to setup two different unit frames to run at the same time and run some AV's. Sure I could drop both in with roughly default configurations. But that's a pretty ridiculous comparison when we've got a number of things you don't (which is perfectly fine).
The data is accurate. You may think the tests were not the best that could be done, but I even admitted as much in my post. Facts are just facts. There's no such thing as a bad fact. It's either true or not. So are you suggesting that I just made up those screenshots?
I'm really not seeing how I'm preptuating bad on ideas on how to measure performance. I'm looking at CPU time in the same environment. While running entirely disembedded.
There's a difference between a test that might be a little bit off and a test that is invalid, yours is the latter. I care more about the accuracy of tests especially when they are posted publicly in a thread that users will read and get confused by.
I am telling you that your method of profiling is incorrect, obviously you did not make up the screen shots but the method you used to gather the data was incorrect and so the actual statics you got should not be used.
Stop mincing words, the data is accurate in the context that the numbers were correctly totally up by the mod using Blizzards API's. The data is not accurate in the context that you're trying to use them, which is that the performance difference between PitBull and Shadowed Unit Frames is only 35%.
And stop taking this so personally just because I'm telling you your statics were not gathered correctly. It does not mean it's a personal insult to you. I care more about accuracy and the truth than your personal feelings towards this.
If you want to argue the performance numbers are that different based on modules fine, but from the sounds of it you disabled the ones that weren't relevant so they shouldn't have been an issue in terms of CPU. Especially with the fact that I would assume you reset the CPU stats right before starting to profile to remove the startup counts.