Interesting! You must be the first non-English to try the translations. I am surprised no one has spotted it before. It also shows something I did not know about the translations.
If you would be so kind please try editing the deDE file and remove any line that does not have a translation and try again.
BTW I would love a screen shot of a report to raid chat in German when it's working!
- Registered User
Member for 11 years, 9 months, and 27 days
Last active Fri, Oct, 4 2013 14:30:36
- 0 Followers
- 309 Total Posts
- 0 Thanks
Apr 10, 2008French, Spanish and TW translations added. Thanks submitters.Posted in: Raid AddOns
"RaidBuffStatus-1.44b\\Core.lua:2602: attempt to concatenate upvalue 'inspectqueueunitid' (a nil value)\n(tail call)" should be fixed now. Thanks for reporting it.
Apr 5, 2008Posted in: Raid AddOnsQuote from Schwick »
Besides the last two requested features, would also be cool to add "group number" to the announcing of the missing buffs.
For example "<Fortitude> Schwick (1), John (3), Burk (3)."
Meaning I'm in G1 missing fortitude and John and Burk are in G3 missing fortitude.
Group numbers feature was added yesterday. It only does this for buffs that group based like Fortitude.
Apr 2, 2008Fixed in version 1.41. You were right. The flask is called "Shattrath Flask of Pure Death" but the buff is called Pure Death of Shattrath. I've no idea why the inconsistent naming. Shadow priest today was buffed but showed as no flask.Posted in: Raid AddOns
Apr 1, 2008Posted in: Raid AddOnsQuote from sixofnine »
Nice add-on, it has replaced XRS for me.
Why thank you. Me too.
They were added the evening 2.4 came out. So maybe your version is old? 1.40 is the current - released 1st April 2008. Versions prior to 1.4 don't quite work right with 2.4 either so upgrading is advisable.
If you do have a current version then please say as I may well have made a typo or something making those not work.
Mar 31, 2008Spirit buff spam removed. Groups 5-8 ignored (just temporary fix). Now works with 2.4 properly (this took a long time to nail).Posted in: Raid AddOns
The spam is replaced with a report window showing specialisations. Only shows spirit and motw so far.
I've not done the group numbers yet nor any pally buff checks.
Untrimmed screenshot here:
(yeah yeah I don't use xperl or other neater raid frames)
I need to add an options window next so I can add things like group numbers and what buffs to display and warn on and raid size.
Mar 30, 2008Posted in: LibrariesQuote from Peragor »
Well, I've had multiple requests to cache the talent information, enough requests that warrants a discussion.
What would be the ideal cache data structure be? There is a lot of info:
TalentTreeName, TalentTreeIconTexturePath, TalentTreePointsSpent, TalentTreeBackgroundImage
TalentName, TalentIconTexturePath, TalentTier, TalentColumn, TalentCurrentRank, TalentMaxRank
TalentIconTexturePath - what is this and where can I find docs or examples on it?
Mar 25, 2008Posted in: Raid AddOnsQuote from Schwick »
Any ETA on the requested changes? I know some people in my raid are getting a little fed-up with the discovery of a person having spirit-buff (that and setting group limits could really help).
Yeah we had someone last night at Vashj DC and reconnect several times then announce all the spirit buffers again and again. Very annoying. I have a new version which limits it to just the raid leader which was easy to do. However that's not what you want. The answer to your question is that by the end of this week or possibly Monday. Wife is away all weekend so I will have time to myself to work on RBS!
Mar 19, 2008Posted in: Raid AddOnsQuote from Zidomo »
Please remove the "addon:Say(L["Priest with Spirit talent has been detected in the raid: "] .. name) function. Or else make it optional.
Posting such things in party/raid chat without allowing the user to alter them (w/o code edits) is not good.
Yeah will do. It was mostly for debug.
Mar 17, 2008Ok I understand. What I can do is add an option to ignore grps 6-8 then if you always put ppl in 6-8 that should not be included in the checking no config would need to change between 10 and 25 man.Posted in: Raid AddOns
My guild raids a lot and I have a day job and my wife needs boosting through kara attunement and and and so I will get as much added to the addon as soon as I have time.
Mar 17, 2008Posted in: Raid AddOnsQuote from Schwick »
I got two feature requests:
- Add an option to only check Group 1-5 (25-man) and an option for group 1-2 (10 man)
- Add a blessing buff check (it doesn't have to be advanced or anything, just simple check if everybody has X amount of blessings)
One (silly) question though, what is the difference between "boss" check and "trash" check?
25 and 10 man - I never understood why anyone wanted those features in XRS. Is the idea that you put some people in the higher groups as spares? We only have in the raid the players needed and that's it so the 10/25 check is never needed. Can you explain please?
Boss check checks people have flasks or 2 elixirs and everything else. Trash is just everything else. These will be configurable soon. Also your request for group numbers is noted and planned thanks.
If only I was not raiding so much I could code more.
Mar 16, 2008Posted in: Raid AddOnsQuote from Phanx »
No. The way AceLocale works, as long as the English string exists, if another language doesn't have a translation for that string, the English string will be used.
Ok great thanks. I am doing a major rewrite of the way it handles buff checks to make it more trivial to add others and to make it more dynamic and allow buffs checks to be hidden etc. It will still work out of the box but still allow configuration. When I have done that then I will include the german translation.
Quote from Phanx »
Edit: was posting while downloading updates, and I see:
r64588 | danielbarron | 2008-03-15 08:39:45 -0400 (Sat, 15 Mar 2008) | 2 lines Changed paths: M /trunk/RaidBuffStatus/RaidBuffStatus.toc M /trunk/RaidBuffStatus/ReadMe.txt RaidBuffStatus: - Fixed addon name in game so it says ace2
Why, why, why? This tag is unsightly, unnecessary, and leads to meaningless branding and fanboi-ism. >_<
I did it as all the other ace addons I have installed do it. I assumed it was normal. Perhaps there is a style guide you can point me at so I don't make any more mistakes. Having said that if all others do this then why not this?
Mar 14, 2008Posted in: Raid AddOnsQuote from Pachelbel »
I'm trying to keep it simple, with zero config. I've been working on some different display formats -- if you have suggestions I would appreciate it. As for reporting, we mostly call things over vent. You can click to send a whisper to a person listing what they are missing.
It's personal preference but I like how XRS does it which is what I have emulated. I.e. with a dashboard and report to raid. Whispering the person is an interesting idea.
Quote from Pachelbel »
I check for temporary weapon buffs by looking at the text available from their equipped items in slots 15 and 16. The Gratuity mod is brilliant for this.
- To post a comment, please login or register a new account.