Excellent, thank you, that's something I missed about not having KTM installed as someone who does a lot of the more finicky raid leadering stuff, it'll be nice to set Master Target again for the schlubs that need it.Quote from
With agreement of Antiarc (the main ThreatLib author), I moved most of the broadcasting stuff into ThreatLib.
ThreatToKTM is now a front-end to enable it and display a few data.
It also offers handy KLHTM commands to group officers:
- set master target,
- clear master target,
- query versions.
Option to enable KLHTM broadcasting may be added to other ThreatLib front-ends (Antiarc said it will add it to Omen).
- Registered User
Member for 14 years, 3 months, and 26 days
Last active Fri, Oct, 4 2013 14:29:42
- 0 Followers
- 131 Total Posts
- 0 Thanks
Jun 21, 2007_ForgeUser23403 posted a message on FuBar_ThreatFu - light-weight front-end for Threat-1.0 (and its KLHTM support)Posted in: General AddOns
Jun 17, 2007_ForgeUser23403 posted a message on FuBar_ThreatFu - light-weight front-end for Threat-1.0 (and its KLHTM support)Not that this is helpful since you've made a large change to how the threat updates are sent, but your old method was also causing other GUIs for Threat-1.0 to bug out (I appeared ridiculously high on both Omen on this computer, and KTM on the other computer I was testing with).Posted in: General AddOns
I'll give the updated version a shot though.
Jun 15, 2007Recount is very, very heavy on the memory usage due to the sheer amount of data it stores. I've never noticed it causing performance problems even when PerformanceFu reported it using 20 MB of data however.Posted in: General AddOns
I'd recommend Violation instead if you don't care about the amount of detail Recount provides, it's far lighter on the memory usage.
Jun 15, 2007_ForgeUser23403 posted a message on FuBar_ThreatFu - light-weight front-end for Threat-1.0 (and its KLHTM support)Thanks Adirelle, I'll give this a shot tomorrow. I can easily verify if the threat is being sent properly or not as I happen to have another computer in the same room I can use for testing this.Posted in: General AddOns
Jun 11, 2007I'd recommend enabling 'Show Enemy Cast Bar - Portrait' in WoW's interface options if you haven't, or if you have a good UnitFrame mod, check whether it supports target casting bars. It'll make checking for the fears fairly simple.Posted in: Raid AddOns
Jun 7, 2007Posted in: Libraries
It also is better that even if your guild doesn't force you to, there's always a few people that view new developments on these things with some distrust and simply refuse to update because what they have 'works well enough' even if it's not as good.Quote from FlareCDE »
And if your guild forces you to use that inefficient and inadequate mod because they're too set in their ways? A way to report data from Threat to KTM is pretty essencial.Quote from Tunga »
I don't see the need. If people insist on running an inefficient and inadequate mod then isn't that their problem? I know my guild will be switching to ThreatLib once the values are all in :) .
I know a lot of the people I know still use CTRA, but this isn't an issue as oRA and CTRA can work together.
Jun 5, 2007Posted in: Libraries
I'd suggest implementing such to KTM communications as a seperate mod. That way people can decide for themselves whether they should or should not send their threat to KTM users.Quote from Antiarc »
Perhaps eventually, but Threat tracks threat on a per-target basis, and KTM expects a sum of all threat generated in the fight to that point; I'm still mulling over the validity of any data sent to KTM.
Jun 5, 2007_ForgeUser23403 posted a message on Official Threat-1.0 error reporting and discussion threadI get this error whenever Hydross the Unstable yells:Posted in: Libraries
[2007/06/05 22:55:07-664-x7]: Threat-1.0\Threat-1.0\ThreatNPCModuleCore.lua:187: attempt to call local 'yell_arg2' (a table value)
Jun 5, 2007Posted in: General AddOns
Non-unique as in you can have multiple buffs with the same name/icon up at the same time. (HoTs fall under this category, most other buffs don't)Quote from deluXE »
What do you mean by "non-unique"?
Jun 5, 2007This isn't exact, but a rough summary of what he says (Which makes it imperfect but possibly usable), this is transcribed from what I remember he said. Note that he has two distinct yells when pulled.Posted in: Raid AddOns
"The legion will conquer all."
"All mortals will perish."
There's probably commas or exclamation marks missing from these, capitalization may not match either (Legion might possibly need a capital L).
Jun 5, 2007Doom Lord Kazzak's pulling yell has changed, he no longer yells 'For the Legion! For Kil'jaeden!' when you pull him. Unfortunately I didn't think of transcripting what he does yell during pulls now. Currently this means the first Enrage timer is missing.Posted in: Raid AddOns
- To post a comment, please login or register a new account.