- Registered User
Member for 12 years, 5 months, and 6 days
Last active Tue, Sep, 30 2008 22:06:02
- 0 Followers
- 50 Total Posts
- 0 Thanks
Jan 22, 2008Huh. It was pretty interesting to read that; thanks for the link.Posted in: General AddOns
Jan 21, 2008Posted in: General AddOnsQuote from Shadowed »
It's possible, but this isn't really an exploit classifying it as one is just silly.
I agree; this is what motivated me to post in the first place.
Quote from Shadowed »Lets say you have a pet named "FooBar" and a Priest named "FooBar" as well, if you type /focus FooBar you can't reliably assume it'll always focus the Priest, but you can manually target the Priest and type /focus target and it works fine. Hence why it's not really broken, you can still focus a Priest just fine but you have to target them and use "target" instead of the name for /focus (or mouseover and such)
And this is sorta what I've been trying to say all along :)
Edit: and thanks for clearing up the /focus Name behavior for me.
Jan 21, 2008Posted in: General AddOnsQuote from Grayhoof »/focus NAME does not work with this hunter pet issue. It behaves just like /target or /targetexact, but actually I don't think /focus can take a name, I think you have to give it a unitid or nothing, meaning your current target.
I know that focus can take a name if the player is in your group/raid. I don't recall ever trying to type it out for an enemy though, so I don't know if that works.
Edit: what I was trying to say above (if what you posted was in response to it) was to just /focus the player in question (however you can successfully manage that) and use that instead of the arena mod. And report it as a bug if a pet with the same name screws things up when you try to use a focus frame or a /cast [target=focus] or do anything that uses the 'focus' ID.
Jan 21, 2008Posted in: General AddOnsQuote from psyquest »
Sorry mate but in my part of the world awol means something has gone pear shaped (Absent Without Official Leave) and against conventional rule. I hope you see the imagery used.
My understanding of the term is also 'Absent Without Official Leave,' and it has never meant anything more than the 'absent' idea to me, which is different, if not a far stretch, from the idea 'does not function reliably.' That's why I posted what I did, but if it has grown to mean something else where you live, I'll clam up!
Back on topic, these are the best options for you that I can think of, since there is nothing that can be done with the API to work around the problem now:
1. Report the player/pet and see what happens (good luck).
2. Post a suggestion in the WoW UI or Suggestion forums to allow a way to reliably target a player enemy based on its name while ignoring pet units (good luck).
3. Use /focus on the target that shares the name with the pet, and use that instead of your arena mod for that particular unit.
If number #3 fails due to the naming issue (it shouldn't!), it is a bug which should be posted on the WoW UI forums.
Quote from Shadowed »
It being deleted would more likely mean that even if they said it, they don't actually consider it an exploit.
Not necessarily. They have a history of deleting threads that detail things that are actual exploits so that other players do not attempt to duplicate them.
Jan 21, 2008Posted in: General AddOnsQuote from Grayhoof »
It messes with anything that uses names to establish a target. That usually means macros but many mods use macros to do their targeting/focusing as that is the only way to do some custom functionality since the introduction of SecureFrames and protected code.
This is all my opinion, and is based on things I've heard trolling forums and such.
I'd understand Blizzard taking action if this naming issue interfered with the behavior of their code. For example: /focus SomeName, where SomeName is shared by an enemy player and an enemy pet; followed by /cast [target=focus] spell. If this did not work, then I can see them doing something about it (codewise or policywise).
If your mod (which I love, by the way) failed to work because it targeted the nearest enemy that matched SomeName, I would be really surprised if they cared. This is the default /target behavior and has been the default behavior for as long as I can remember (note: I have a poor memory!). This feeling is reinforced by the fact that they have only given users two unique ways to target a specific unit (target and focus), and have, for example, denied the request to target things by raid icons.
But, you know, they're the ones who choose policy, not me. This is just my interpretation based on information I have received.
Jan 21, 2008There is no way to work around this with the UI, and I'll eat my metaphorical hat if anyone finds actual evidence of Blizzard saying this is an exploit.Posted in: General AddOns
PS: Look up the meaning of AWOL.
Edit: I just read the comments and somebody mentioned that it was messing with focus macros. If that is the case, I can see why Blizzard would take action. But it still strikes me as a "oh we need to fix our UI code" thing over a "oh we need to create a new policy" thing.
Jan 16, 2008_ForgeUser1187293 posted a message on Combuctor: All in one, filterable displays for your inventory and bankGiving the beta a go.Posted in: General AddOns
I realized that I forgot to say this in my post above, so: thanks for the spiffy mod!
Jan 9, 2008_ForgeUser1187293 posted a message on Combuctor: All in one, filterable displays for your inventory and bankBeen using the 3.0 alpha without any issues. My only request is to be able to close the bag frame by hitting the escape key without simultaneously opening the game menu (options, key bindings, log out, etc.).Posted in: General AddOns
Oct 9, 2007Posted in: Unit FramesQuote from tet »
//picasaweb.google.com/nimchip/WoW/photo?authkey=TfN_1o2wCsY#5118499346633950130">" target="" data-ensure-absolute>http://picasaweb.google.com/nimchip/WoW/photo?authkey=TfN_1o2wCsY#5118499346633950130"> src="" target="" data-ensure-absolute>http://lh5.google.com/nimchip/RwiQCWsvg7I/AAAAAAAAAEY/jc0XcGIw9Cw/s800/pitbullissue.jpg" />
There's an issue reported in the jira-thingy, I updated it with your image. I can't tell you anything you can do to fix it; it does it to me as well.
Oct 8, 2007_ForgeUser1187293 posted a message on Any ACE2 DMG Meter Exist that Syncs with SWSTATS or WWS Client?Unless I'm mistaken, both of you are a little off. WWS doesn't synchronize data in-game, but it can merge different combat logs of different actors outside of WoW.Posted in: General AddOns
Soo, if you release or DC or are somehow farther than 200 yards from the action, you will miss out on some data without somebody else (either their combat log for WWS, or using some meter that 'syncs') to fill in the gaps.
If you want an overall breakdown of raid activities, use either SWS or WWS. If you want to just track your own performance, use whatever. There may be another addon that works as well as SWS (in terms of information accuracy and depth), I stopped looking because SWS is perfect for me.
Sep 19, 2007I'd like to report a few problems. I'm still using r47902 (waiting for the dust to settle from your change to 'Rock'), so these problems may be fixed already.Posted in: Unit Frames
-Frame Updating in Combat 1: When a new player is added to the party in combat, the frame does not show until you leave combat. This does not happen if a member leaves the party, then rejoins it (all while in combat), so I'm guessing this is part of the frame recycling system? Would it be possible to turn this off for party frames?
-Frame Updating in Combat 2: When changing targets in combat, sometimes the new health/buffs/whatever information does not display on the target frame until something changes. I can't duplicate this consistently, but it happens mostly when I pull two mobs, one dies (and I may loot in between, here), and change targets to the other one.
-The Random Giant Box of Color: I saw someone post about this a while ago, but it has happened recently, usually when joining a battleground. It disappears on its own after a short time. Any update on this?
Post back if you want any more information from me (I was vague about the last one because I know it's been reported before). Thanks for all your work.
Jun 26, 2007I don't think so. Grid shows up fine.Posted in: Unit Frames
Edit: if I had to guess, it might be something to do with how the frames are recycled. When the frames are 'destroyed' they probably removed the unit attribute as well as the UnitWatch.
Jun 26, 2007I haven't been able to find any information on this, but the party frames do not update in combat for me. Example: I am killing a monster, I get invited to a group, and the frames don't show until I kill it and get out of combat.Posted in: Unit Frames
Can anyone tell me what to do to fix this? Or is this a known problem?
May 11, 2007Hi. Just wanted to make a small request for how the notes show up on the minimap. Would it be possible to have an option to disable the mouse/tooltip when you hover over the icons on the minimap? I'd like to be able to mouse over a mining node and see what is actually there, rather than what was there the last time I mined.Posted in: Map/Minimap AddOns
Thanks for the great mod.
- To post a comment, please login or register a new account.