Something I've been thinking about is adding the Trade Skill recipes to Babble-Tradeskill-2.2. The question is, would it be better to:
A) Keep them in my own add-on, I can't think of many mods out there that would need them?
B) Create a new library, say Babble-TradeskillItems-2.2 which would have all the items in it, or break it down to Babble-TradeskillAlchemy-2.2 which would list just the alchemy ones in it, etc.
C) Just add to the existing Babble-Tradeskill-2.2
Creating babble-tradeskillsitems and localizing it can really help developers and users to have an addon working in their language, and really up-to-date.
Many of the tradeskills addons (on wowace) today dont work in french language, because all need to be localized.
So, i prefer localizing one new lib and having all addons use it but starting same job again and again each time there are new recipes ^^
So, i think a new babble lib could be a great new idea :)
I talked with Ck and got the thumbs up (was worried because the size of it).
Added all the recipes into it, including a couple translations (not my work, other people did it for me with ARL). The French and German translations are partially done but people are working on them. :)
I found some missing translations when I opened TradeJunkie yesterday: Critter Enlarger, Blue Smoke Flare, Adamantite Series Adamantite Arrow Maker, Khorium Toolbox, Red Smoke Flare, Goblin Tonk Controller, Gnomish Tonk Controller. (yeah, I know it is an old topic - but I didn't find any other relevant one...)
We had a discussion on IRC about this last week or two weeks ago.
With the advent of 2.4, Babble-Tradeskill is no longer needed. It was probably a bad idea to put all the locals in this regardless, however hindsight is 20/20 and no one posted against it. :P
Is there still any addon that use this lib?
Ackis, who first added all recipes to this lib for ARL no longer use it ... so it may be totally useless to maintain localizations.
Is there still any addon that use this lib?
Ackis, who first added all recipes to this lib for ARL no longer use it ... so it may be totally useless to maintain localizations.
There were other mods using them as well once I added them, however you don't need to with 2.4 and GetSpellInfo.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
A) Keep them in my own add-on, I can't think of many mods out there that would need them?
B) Create a new library, say Babble-TradeskillItems-2.2 which would have all the items in it, or break it down to Babble-TradeskillAlchemy-2.2 which would list just the alchemy ones in it, etc.
C) Just add to the existing Babble-Tradeskill-2.2
Comments, suggestions?
Many of the tradeskills addons (on wowace) today dont work in french language, because all need to be localized.
So, i prefer localizing one new lib and having all addons use it but starting same job again and again each time there are new recipes ^^
So, i think a new babble lib could be a great new idea :)
Added all the recipes into it, including a couple translations (not my work, other people did it for me with ARL). The French and German translations are partially done but people are working on them. :)
line 2764: ["Balanced Shadow Draenite"] = "Ausbalancierter Schattendraenit",
translation doesn't exist in other locales, commenting this line out solves all problems...
Added it to enUS
We had a discussion on IRC about this last week or two weeks ago.
With the advent of 2.4, Babble-Tradeskill is no longer needed. It was probably a bad idea to put all the locals in this regardless, however hindsight is 20/20 and no one posted against it. :P
I think it should be (but dunno 100% sure especially on the * marked ones):
there are different translations for different gender. For example:
this is just a female translation. if you leave out the marked letters it's the male version
Ackis, who first added all recipes to this lib for ARL no longer use it ... so it may be totally useless to maintain localizations.
There were other mods using them as well once I added them, however you don't need to with 2.4 and GetSpellInfo.